Lead Generation Best Practices Part 7: Measure Beyond Cost-Per-Lead

Posted by Dan McDade

Find me on:
on Dec 14, 2010 12:00:00 PM

Lead Generation Featured Image

Best Practice #7Conventional wisdom—that something called a “lead” can and should be had at consistently lower price points where it will still deliver value—is at the root of a host of sales and marketing problems and deserves a closer look.

The value of a lower cost-per-lead approach may have merit early in the funnel where inbound marketing and marketing automation can be helpful in moving large numbers of sales prospects to raise their hands and express interest. Problems arise when marketing points to delivery of hundreds and thousands of names delivered at a low cost-per-lead while reps shake their heads wondering why the unqualified names they receive are even called “leads.”

Striving for lower cost leads while defining a lead as a sales-ready buyer is a recipe for disaster. Cost-per-opportunity and cost-per-deal are better indexes when measuring prospect development initiatives. This is particularly true where there is a complex buying landscape, a long sales cycle and a high-investment solution. ROI measurement and performance metrics here should be grounded—not in volume—but in opportunity quality, conversion ability and revenue generated on investment.

The cost-per-lead is going to be driven by how a lead is defined, the nature of the solution and selling process and the type of metrics used to measure marketing performance. The reality is that leads cost what they cost—particularly when developing high-value, qualified sales opportunities in complex sales.

Another important measurement of program performance can be found in tracking and reporting on lead categories set forth in SiriusDecisions' Demand Metrics Waterfall. Success criteria can be clearly established by measuring the percentage of Marketing Qualified Leads (MQLs) that become Sales Accepted Leads (SALs) as well as measuring the percentage of Marketing Qualified Leads (MQLs) that become Sales Qualified Leads (SQLs). Perfection, of course, is that 100% of MQLs become SALs and 100% of SALs become SQLs. But sales and marketing demonstrate great progress toward full alignment the closer both percentages get to 100%.

The next installment concludes the series and reviews the seven best-practice lead generation recommendations.

Read Introducing the 7-Part Series
Read Part 1: Agree on Lead Definition
Read Part 2: Segment & Test Your Market
Read Part 3: When to Use Outbound vs Inbound
Read Part 4: Dedicate Qualifying Resources

Read Part 5: Multiply Touches/Media/Cycles
Read Part 6: Fewer Leads Are Better
This blog is Part 7: Measure Beyond Cost-Per-Lead
Read Summarizing the 7-Part Series

 

By Dan McDade


Tell us what you think!

Topics: Lead Generation, B2B Sales, Prospect Development, Cost Per Lead, Marketing ROI


Revenue - Inbound - Nurturing = The GAP. We guarantee you'll be surprised by your actual metrics. Try our Lead Revenue Calculator
Get the Calculator

filter blog posts

  • Search

Top 5 posts

How Much Leads Cost

I review a lot of content on this topic and am amazed at what I find written about lead cost. For example:

Why Don’t Companies Want to Talk to Anyone?

It’s truly strange when companies enter the stealth mode. They hide phone numbers, dial-by-name directories, and employee names,..

What Should the Sales Close Rate Be?

I’ve read and heard (from a well-known industry analyst firm) that best-in-class companies close 30% of sales qualified leads..

Gold Calling vs. Cold Calling

I've written many blog posts on the fact that cold calling isn't dead. In fact, doing the right amount of research, adding a..